Site icon Datagami

Lady with the Lamp

Lately, I’ve been fascinated to learn about women data pioneers. Florence Nightingale was a nurse. But did you know she was also a statistician? In fact, she was the first female to be elected into the Royal Statistical Society. That’s really cool!

Flo (as I call her for short) created a way to graphically represent the cause of soldier mortality during the Crimean war (1853 -1856) by using a polar area chart.

In case it’s hard to read…

Infographics weren’t really a thing back then. By presenting her data in this fun new way, she was able to quickly communicate the scale of the problem – most soldiers’ deaths weren’t from their wounds, but from preventable conditions like cholera and dysentery. The death rate went from 42% to 2% with Flo on the job!

Interesting Sidenotes:

So, I’m wondering if Flo’s polar area chart has a place in today’s visualizations. The polar area chart is similar to a pie chart. It differs in that each slice in a polar area chart has equal angles and it’s the length of the slice that varies. There’s a lot of visual best practice guides that warn against the use of pie charts. We tend to see things in length versus angles. And poking around in visualization tools like Tableau, there is no Show Me option for a polar area chart.

Does the stacked bar chart or area chart show us the same information in a more easily interpreted way? What do you think?

Found Flo’s source data and a great write-up about the math behind coxcombs at Understanding Uncertainty.

Exit mobile version